On 08/05/2009 11:47 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > And maintainers can choose whether or not they > want to take on the work of shipping updates in the adventurous > repository. How does this work? It would seem that the adventurous repository would be mandatory as something that changes ABI would require other packages to be rebuilt. Also, having the expectation that the other repository is for security updates doesn't address the problem of a security release breaking ABI. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
