Ville: sorry for the mis-attribution. Michael: But perhaps I did understand the diagram--in that I observed that it didn't attempt to cover new package submission. Thus, I've attempted to enhance the diagram so that it /can/ cover that topic (which is frequently discussed) as well. So my effort is complementary to Ville's, not conflicting. M On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 17:42, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 16:44:47 -0400, Michael Tiemann wrote: > > > Finally, a word about the diagram: I think that Warren's recently posted > > Fedora submissions process was a great start, but it did not reach far > > enough. > > I think you've misunderstood the diagram, which is Ville Skyttä's attempt > at explaining the "fedora.us update submission process" in a non-textual > way: http://www.fedora.us/wiki/PackageSubmissionQAPolicy#updates > > It simplifies the package update process for the trusted package > maintainers a lot, since they no longer need to wait for reviews and > approvals from other people. The diagram does not cover submissions of > new packages. > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
