Leonard den Ottolander (leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > How do the Red Hat developers perceive this issue? Is the "intersection > > > between OSI and FSF" approach a good enough compromise for you? > > > > It's probably more-or-less mirrors the policy now. > > Good catch from Warren: Are you speaking of Core or Extras? Assuming the > latter: > > Yes, but can we make that policy *explicit* please. That is the whole > point of this thread. The fact that although many people assume we are > using *something* *like* the FSF and/or OSI definitions of open source > some obviously don't (open software versus free source). Now if we can > get the precise definition used in writing the former could slap the > latter with a reference to that definition. I've got no problems with making stuff more explicit... first comes making updating the web site easier. :) Bill
