Hi Bill, > > How do the Red Hat developers perceive this issue? Is the "intersection > > between OSI and FSF" approach a good enough compromise for you? > > It's probably more-or-less mirrors the policy now. Good catch from Warren: Are you speaking of Core or Extras? Assuming the latter: Yes, but can we make that policy *explicit* please. That is the whole point of this thread. The fact that although many people assume we are using *something* *like* the FSF and/or OSI definitions of open source some obviously don't (open software versus free source). Now if we can get the precise definition used in writing the former could slap the latter with a reference to that definition. Or we could rediscuss and try to come to a consensus in an open way, but that might take a little longer ;-) . Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
