On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Adam Miller <maxamillion@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There are also other two big problem, imho, now, with prelink support:
1 - it render impossibile to do a centralizzated integrity checker (with as example rfc.sf.net ): very very bad
2 - not checked if this problem is actual or not: prelink erases file-based capabilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456105
If actual it render new rpm possibility in this area pointless
I am curious as to this answer as well because prelink has been
something that actually hurt my netbook in performance so I nuked it.
There are also other two big problem, imho, now, with prelink support:
1 - it render impossibile to do a centralizzated integrity checker (with as example rfc.sf.net ): very very bad
2 - not checked if this problem is actual or not: prelink erases file-based capabilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456105
If actual it render new rpm possibility in this area pointless
-Adam
--
http://maxamillion.googlepages.com
---------------------------------------------------------
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
