Re: prelink: is it worth it?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 04:45:55PM +0200, devzero2000 wrote:
> 2 - not checked if this problem  is actual or not: prelink erases file-based
> capabilities

And not just that - it nukes other stuff too.  Old-style OCaml
bytecode programs[1] and there was some MinGW binary problem too,
can't find the BZ for that right now.

I think the mistake was to change binaries directly.  It should just
store additional hints about binaries in a /var/ directory somewhere.

Rich.

[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460730

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 75 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux