Re: noarch subpackages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



yersinia wrote:
> No everyone agreed with this or would the spec/rpm version frammentation
> go forever.
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/rpm-maint@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg00885.html
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/rpm-maint@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg00939.html

People are suggesting unified macros and guidelines, but the reality is that 
they aren't, so high-quality, guideline-compliant cross-distribution 
specfiles are not possible at this time.

        Kevin Kofler


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux