On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 19:19, Steven Pritchard wrote: > So should those packages be renamed to whatever-doc (or *-doc be > renamed to *-docs)? FC3test1: 10 * -doc, 5 * -docs, 1 * -manual. fedora.us: 2 * -doc, 2 * -docs, 0 * -manual. rpmseek.com: 1204 * -doc, 129 * -docs, 141 * -manual (mostly JPackage) Dunno about renaming, but based on the above, -doc could at least be a recommendation for new packages (but then again, IMVHO -docs "sounds" better ;). > Or maybe we should just make sure all of the > packages have a Provides: foo-doc[s] so getting the name wrong still > works (at least for apt). Well, if adding the Provides, one could add Obsoletes and rename while at it... assuming a miracle happens and there's suddenly a consensus what they should be renamed to.
