> >>Steven Pritchard wrote : > >>>Oops. That's what I get for just doing rpm -qp *-doc-* without > >>>looking at all of the descriptions. :-) > >Matthias Saou wrote: > >>Not to mention that you missed all the *-docs-* packages ;-) > Mark Derricutt wrote: > >Strike one for consistent naming :) My thought exactly. On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 10:22:37AM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > + apache manual I think... Most of the rest of the documentation packages already have the right group. gnome-user-docs Documentation iiimf-docs Documentation postgresql-docs Applications/Databases python-docs Documentation ruby-docs Documentation httpd-manual Documentation So should those packages be renamed to whatever-doc (or *-doc be renamed to *-docs)? Or maybe we should just make sure all of the packages have a Provides: foo-doc[s] so getting the name wrong still works (at least for apt). Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve@xxxxxxxxx http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-7360 Mobile: (618)567-7320
