Steven Pritchard wrote : > I was just looking around at other packages to see what Group: tag > should go on a -doc subpackage. It looks like Documentation is the > right group, but I noticed that this is rather inconsistent in the > official packages. > > exim-doc Documentation > gtk-doc Development/Tools > kernel-doc Documentation > nasm-doc Development/Languages > selinux-doc System Environment/Base > sendmail-doc Documentation > tclx-doc Development/Languages > tetex-doc Applications/Publishing > tix-doc Development/Languages > xorg-x11-doc Documentation > > Given that the Group: tag is essentially meaningless, I wasn't sure > this justified mention in bugzilla, but it probably should be fixed. gtk-doc is a tool for managing documentation, so its category seems correct, OTOH for the others, changing to "Documentation" would seem to make sense. Note that indeed this tag is seldom used, but can actually become useful once surfaced, in a web interface or in a package management tool (synaptic uses it for instance). Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) - Linux kernel 2.6.6-1.435.2.3 Load : 0.15 0.27 0.37
