On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jerry James wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Seth Vidal<skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, as I explained on irc, it's doable - but where it gets implemented (and
what else it breaks) is not as obvious as an easy fix of adding an obsoletes
to the pkgs which are changing arch.
The bug is still open and it will get worked on but it is pressing when
there is an utterly trivial solution the packager can choose.
Can we put a note about this somewhere on or under
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoarchSubpackages ? It's
clear that how yum behaves in this respect differs from what some
packagers expect.
FWIW, my expectations were set by these, especially the latter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189998
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192837
No.
Putting a note there will just need to be cleaned up when I get to fixing
that bug.
It's incredibly minor.
-sv
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
