-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Seth Vidal wrote: >> >>> It's not about the upgrade process. It is only about compare_providers. >>> >>> You have 3 pkgs providing 'foo' >>> >>> foo-1.1.noarch >>> foo-1.0.x86_64 >>> foo-1.0.i386 >>> >>> Which one do you pick on x86_64 or i686? >>> >>> We weight extra toward pkgs in the same arch as the running system. And >>> then the arch NEAREST to the running arch. >> >> Maybe I'm just being naive, but I'd expect a newer EVR to trump any arch >> weighting. > > really? > > So if you're on x86_64 > > and you have foo-1.1.i386 and foo-1.0.x86_64 > > and you run: > > yum install foo > > you would expect foo-1.1.i386 to be installed instead of foo-1.0.x86_64? > > REALLY? > > -sv A special exemption for noarch in arch compares and version differences? If it's between some arch and noarch, defer to the version checker. - --Ben -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAko2oUMACgkQiPi+MRHG3qThCACgsf8PKu/aJKNw1KO7vvRkN3fL KZAAl3gMbcnFvyfFykH3lUOLzzE0ndQ= =B/QM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
