On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Seth Vidal<skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, as I explained on irc, it's doable - but where it gets implemented (and > what else it breaks) is not as obvious as an easy fix of adding an obsoletes > to the pkgs which are changing arch. > > The bug is still open and it will get worked on but it is pressing when > there is an utterly trivial solution the packager can choose. Can we put a note about this somewhere on or under https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoarchSubpackages ? It's clear that how yum behaves in this respect differs from what some packagers expect. FWIW, my expectations were set by these, especially the latter: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189998 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192837 Regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
