Re: Changing the default 32-bit x86 arch for Fedora 12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:22:12PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:31:17PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > I'm not sure I understand why not.  Are you saying that if RedHat  
> > decided that RHEL7 was to support Sparc , there'd be no interest in  
> > making that a primary arch?
> 
> RHEL supports Itanic, and that isn't even _built_ for Fedora, never
> mind as a secondary arch.

IIUC, it isn't setup us a proper secondary arch, but there are people who
are rebuilding Fedora for ia64

  http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ia64-list/

Daniel
-- 
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London   -o-   http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o-  http://virt-manager.org  -o-  http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505  -o-  F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux