On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:22:12PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:31:17PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > I'm not sure I understand why not. Are you saying that if RedHat > > decided that RHEL7 was to support Sparc , there'd be no interest in > > making that a primary arch? > > RHEL supports Itanic, and that isn't even _built_ for Fedora, never > mind as a secondary arch. IIUC, it isn't setup us a proper secondary arch, but there are people who are rebuilding Fedora for ia64 http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-ia64-list/ Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
