On Monday 15 June 2009 03:31:17 pm Jon Ciesla wrote: > Seth Vidal wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >>> BTW are those new VIA netbooks SSE2-capable? > >> > >> Additionally, what will this do to RHEL? I can't imagine RHEL > >> customers being too happy about this for RHEL7(?), and if i386 would > >> still be in RHEL, it would worry me that it would only be a secondary > >> arch in Fedora. . . > > > > This is not relevant for fedora's decisions. > > > > -sv > > I'm not sure I understand why not. Are you saying that if RedHat > decided that RHEL7 was to support Sparc , there'd be no interest in > making that a primary arch? considering RHEL ships on ia64 and s390x which only one of them is a secondary arch. it would likely remain a secondary arch. Realistically the one arch i see being promoted to primary would be arm. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
