On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Lennart Poettering<mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 14.06.09 16:11, Jeff Spaleta (jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> >> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Lennart Poettering<mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Are you speaking of the same smolt that lists es1371 as most popular >> > sound card? i.e. a sound card that has been out of production since >> > about 10 years now? Somehow I have serious doubts about the validity >> > of the smolt data. >> >> You might have found a bug in the tallying there in how cards are >> self-identifying product strings. > > ci devices identify them via numeric ids only, the strings come from > the hwdata databases. > >> You'll notice the same exact entry >> is listed twice in the Audio device table. Are cards using the >> ENS1371 driver misreporting their vendor/card version info? There are >> only 5 listings in the table for the ENS1371 driver. There are dozens >> listed for the Intel ICH driver. I bet if you totalled up counts by >> driver, things would look more sensible to you with intel being a >> reasonably large percentage of the drivers in use. > > It's not just that ens1371 is shown as unrealistically popular, it's > also that it doesn't know a single HDA device. I mean, > seriously... what will smolt claim next? that santa claus exists? It is the card which qemu/kvm emulates .. that is the source of this data (not real hw installations) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
