On Sun, 14.06.09 16:11, Jeff Spaleta (jspaleta@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Lennart Poettering<mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Are you speaking of the same smolt that lists es1371 as most popular > > sound card? i.e. a sound card that has been out of production since > > about 10 years now? Somehow I have serious doubts about the validity > > of the smolt data. > > You might have found a bug in the tallying there in how cards are > self-identifying product strings. ci devices identify them via numeric ids only, the strings come from the hwdata databases. > You'll notice the same exact entry > is listed twice in the Audio device table. Are cards using the > ENS1371 driver misreporting their vendor/card version info? There are > only 5 listings in the table for the ENS1371 driver. There are dozens > listed for the Intel ICH driver. I bet if you totalled up counts by > driver, things would look more sensible to you with intel being a > reasonably large percentage of the drivers in use. It's not just that ens1371 is shown as unrealistically popular, it's also that it doesn't know a single HDA device. I mean, seriously... what will smolt claim next? that santa claus exists? To me it appears that the data shown on this smolt web thingy originates from /dev/random. Unrelated to this, it's fun to see what happens when one accesses http://smolt.fedoraproject.org/static/stats or a similar URL... ;-) Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list