Re: Why a multilib wrapper for non-multilib architectures?!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> Because as a Fedora packager, neither am I responsible nor do I care
> about ia64 packages. Replace ia64 by alpha (or any other secondary
> arch) and rerun my answer.

Sorry, but wrong answer for a Fedora packager. If you lack knowledge, you
should try to get the missing knowledge. And some of the architectures I
mentioned in my initial e-mail are secondary architectures of Fedora, thus
they shouldn't get ignored or wrong handled.


Greetings,
  Robert

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux