On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Robert Scheck wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Probably because it's less maintenance work in the specfile to just always >> add the wrapper. (On the other hand, it means extra work (adding an #ifdef) >> when adding a secondary arch.) > > Well, how would it help to have a wrapper for ia64 if no non-ia64 packages > are getting installed on ia64? Replace ia64 by alpha and rerun my question. > Why a wrapper file, if there's nothing, that could conflict? > Because as a Fedora packager, neither am I responsible nor do I care about ia64 packages. Replace ia64 by alpha (or any other secondary arch) and rerun my answer. Orcan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
