Re: Why a multilib wrapper for non-multilib architectures?!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Probably because it's less maintenance work in the specfile to just always
> add the wrapper. (On the other hand, it means extra work (adding an #ifdef)
> when adding a secondary arch.)

Well, how would it help to have a wrapper for ia64 if no non-ia64 packages
are getting installed on ia64? Replace ia64 by alpha and rerun my question.
Why a wrapper file, if there's nothing, that could conflict?


Greetings,
  Robert

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux