On Fri, 12.06.09 23:27, Bastien Nocera (bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 23:58 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Fri, 12.06.09 22:17, Bastien Nocera (bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > > > No, there's no service activation support. Would it be useful? > > > > > > > > I think it would. Seems to me as if some of the BT functionality > > > > (org.bluez.Manager, ...) might be useful even without having hw > > > > plugged in. > > > > > > All the API in doc/manager-api.txt shows that org.bluez.Manager's sole > > > purpose is to tell you about available Adapters, and enumerate them. > > > It's useless without an adapter plugged in. > > > > Hmm, but what about the "any" object which provides org.bluez.Service? > > What would you use that for? Check for a particular service (such as the > audiosink, etc.) being available? Do you do something special when that > happens? Wouldn't the devices just be invisible to PA in that case? I was more thinking of installing some SDP data or so. Not that I'd have any particular need for that right now, but that's what the API is for afaiu. > If we wanted to add support for dbus activation, we'd also need to > implement a way to close ourselves if no dbus connection were made in a > certain amount of time. Yes, you'd have to count both clients and BT adapters, then. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
