On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 23:58 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 12.06.09 22:17, Bastien Nocera (bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > No, there's no service activation support. Would it be useful? > > > > > > I think it would. Seems to me as if some of the BT functionality > > > (org.bluez.Manager, ...) might be useful even without having hw > > > plugged in. > > > > All the API in doc/manager-api.txt shows that org.bluez.Manager's sole > > purpose is to tell you about available Adapters, and enumerate them. > > It's useless without an adapter plugged in. > > Hmm, but what about the "any" object which provides org.bluez.Service? What would you use that for? Check for a particular service (such as the audiosink, etc.) being available? Do you do something special when that happens? Wouldn't the devices just be invisible to PA in that case? If we wanted to add support for dbus activation, we'd also need to implement a way to close ourselves if no dbus connection were made in a certain amount of time. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
