On Fri, 2009-06-05 at 09:01 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 23:19 +0200, Edwin ten Brink wrote: > > > Aside from all discussions in this thread, the current Bugzilla > > documentation seems quite clear on this topic. Whatever the outcome of > > the discussion is, I think the documentation which is visible to the > > end-user (customer), should at least match the common practice/procedure. > > > > Note also that the discussion is primarily focussed on the Resolution of > > the bug report, while there are also two Keywords available with respect > > to upstream. I've quoted the full texts below for reference. > > > From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/describekeywords.cgi > > This page doesn't really cover Fedora policy or practice, it covers RHEL > policy and practice, which is not the same thing. Sorry, I mistook this: the page that's not strictly entirely applicable to Fedora is the one you link to lower down: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#status not the keyword description page. We don't presently have a separate keyword description page for Fedora. I haven't looked yet at whether any of the keywords or descriptions are inapplicable to Fedora, if they are, we should probably 'branch' that page too. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
