On Thu, 2009-06-04 at 23:19 +0200, Edwin ten Brink wrote: > Aside from all discussions in this thread, the current Bugzilla > documentation seems quite clear on this topic. Whatever the outcome of > the discussion is, I think the documentation which is visible to the > end-user (customer), should at least match the common practice/procedure. > > Note also that the discussion is primarily focussed on the Resolution of > the bug report, while there are also two Keywords available with respect > to upstream. I've quoted the full texts below for reference. > From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/describekeywords.cgi This page doesn't really cover Fedora policy or practice, it covers RHEL policy and practice, which is not the same thing. The next revision of Bugzilla will in fact include a link on this page, directing you to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow for the Fedora policy and practice. That page says in passing: "The resolution UPSTREAM can be used by maintainers to denote a bug that they expect to be fixed by upstream development and naturally rolled back into Fedora as part of the update process. Ideally, a comment should be added with a link to the upstream bug report." but that's just what I wrote when updating the page, it's not based on any official discussion / agreement, so I made it intentionally vague and (hopefully) non-controversial. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
