Re: Package requests wishlist - pine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff Spaleta wrote:
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 09:09:19 -0500, Rex Dieter <rdieter@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 I
believe its vital to have the option to patch at the packaging level,
when its deemed appropriate.
...
the argument is about who has the power to choose when to patch.

And I agree with you in general, that the "power to patch" is a good thing.


And I know pine's license pretty much sucks.

However, I have yet to see any (official) Fedora policy that "the power to patch" or "having a non-sucky license" is required for inclusion in Extras.

-- Rex



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux