On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 07:46, Rex Dieter wrote: [snip] > FYI, > > I've just submitted a "pristine" (ie, unpatched) pine that should > satisify the UW pine licensing terms. > > I've also contacted UW with a request to be able to distribute a > modified/patched version, but I won't hold my breath. Personally, I don't think Fedora ought to ship any package which they can't patch. I know that DJB (no, the non-RH one) stuff has the same restriction, but IMO, it's just ego that has them writing these licenses. When they decide to play by the rules everybody else does, then we let them into our sandbox. Greg
