On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 05:39:06PM -0700, Greg Retkowski wrote: > How about pine? I use pine regularly, however I use pico (the editor) > for any editing of non-sourcecode textfiles. As someone else already mentioned, both have license issues, so I'm not even sure if fedora.us will redistribute either. nano is already in Core, so (IMHO) pico is irrelevant. Not being a pine user, I can't say whether cone is good enough to be a replacement, but I did submit a package. https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1457 If anyone is interested, I could probably spare a few cycles to update the package sometime this week. Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve@xxxxxxxxx http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-7360 Mobile: (618)567-7320
