On 05/29/2009 05:02 PM, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group
in graphical installers
although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe
because they are merged!
I guess there is an option for hidden groups
Have these packages:
Provides: policy(adult content)
And have a package that's mandatory in your respin that has:
Conflicts: policy(adult content)
/me taking one of the good ideas from the flag debate.
Except it is obvious that something contains a flag or not.
Labeling certain content 'questionable' is going to end up being all
over the distro and diluting the value of the tag.
Let me put it this way - if we start randomly rating things in a
provides tag and gnaughty or hot-babe or pr0n-comfort get labeled this
way then I'll make sure I personally add the same tag to:
- firefox
- yum
- sword
- gnome-sword
So the reason you acted in a benevolent way in this community is only
because it didn't give you an opening and the moment that happens you
promise to attack it? While I'm in general agreement that censorship in any
form is bad that's a pretty sad statement to make.
Regards,
Dennis
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
