> I don't think you can just flag Packages as inappropriate because everyone > has his own definition for that term. If you really want to make this work > you'll have to create specific classifications like "nudity" or "violence" > so people can make informed decisions. People might be ok with violent > content but not nudity. When I see a Package marked only as "inappropriate" > that doesn't help me to tell whether *I* would find that inappropriate or > not. > we can use "might be" just like "be polite someone's grandma could be here" and we can list when and why and to whom in the proposal I used the classification used by the upstream if any and I guess all of packages will fall under this. if the upstream says that his package is inappropriate then its worth listing and I guess this is the fedora way. and if the maintainer or reviewer won't show those to his little daughter then it worth being listed I don't demand more than that. BTW: we have specific definitions for those terms but as I said I don't want to impose our definitions and values into fedora, our standards are so high that if something is bad according to any definition then it's bad for us :-) no I mean inspecting a list of tens of packages would be much simpler than inspecting all the tens of thousands of packages -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
