Re: gnaughty is a hot babe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:30:45PM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
>> IMHO it is not Fedora's job to  define family values & moralities. Such morals/values will vary all around the world
>I don't want fedora to define such things, we have our own values predefined.
>
>it should not make my job finding suck packages difficult
>we have more than 10,000 packages in the repos so don't expect me to
>test them all
>
>the package maintainers already classify their packages using Group:
>in the spec file
>
>and they already classify them in yum comps files
>
>I demand a systematic way, a policy that tells a package maintainer
>how to categories their packages in a unified proper way to warn
>people like us from their packages.

You can demand whatever you want, but that doesn't mean you will get it.  If
you want that, draft a proposal for the packaging guidelines and submit it.

Honestly, I agree with the view that it is not Fedora's place to classify
packages in such a manner.

josh

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux