On 05/29/2009 04:12 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > What are you trying to point out? It doesn't become clear to me. The name > of the package you refer to might be a pun or a tongue-in-cheek reference, > but other than that it's a set of tools (a proxy and tools) that can be > used together with arbitrary image gallery web-sites [1]. Is the package > name considered a problem already I don't personally consider it as a problem but I don't know whether others would. The point is that there is no rigid line that applies to everyone if we want to argue exclusion of a package based on morals. The legal line - we trust Red Hat Legal on that. So there is less debate based on that. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
