Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 16:52 +0100, Ewan Mac Mahon wrote:
> I think it's safe to say that if this unwritten rule ever existed, it
> certainly wasn't enforced.

Oh my yes, we were terrible about rule enforcement within RHT.  If it
wasn't a QA check item, it didn't get seen.  Note the terrible package
quality.  The customers who complained about the flags likely never ran
FreeCiv and thus never noticed the flags within.  Had they noticed,
FreeCiv likely would have been altered, or removed.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux