Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Seth Vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
>>> If we end up needing  yum plugin of some kind to handle this can I call
>>> it the free-randomstan plugin?
>>
>> We don't have a yum-patents plugin, or Provides(patents). Why are we
>> going to such lengths here?
>
> How would we have a Provides(patents) on pkgs in fedora? If the pkgs had  
> patent issues we couldn't ship them at all, could we?

What I'm saying is that in the amount of tossing around of ideas in this
thread, and the amount of work that would be required to sanely implement
this (and explain it in a way that makes sense to the users) we could
have fixed 99.9% of the packages to not ship flags about 5 times over.

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux