Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Seth Vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: 
>> * If a program is needed for the main spin but Provides: 
>> Politics(flags), someone must do the work to move the flags into a 
>> subpackage that Provides the flags and patch the program to make 
>> existence of the flags optional.  As noted above, that subpackage 
>> cannot be Required from the package that is on the main spin.
>
> If we end up needing  yum plugin of some kind to handle this can I call 
> it the free-randomstan plugin?

We don't have a yum-patents plugin, or Provides(patents). Why are we
going to such lengths here?

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux