On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 09:08:58PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >On 05/21/2009 08:58 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 20:45 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> IMO, it made sense only during the time when it was a steering committee >>> for the Fedora Extras repository. Now FESCo duties are broad and I don't >>> see why someone only involved with artwork, L10N or documentation but >>> not packaging shouldn't be a leader. >> >> That would make sense if they were making decisions and guidance over >> those groups, only I don't think they are. > >FESCo has grown from being a group concerned only about packages in a >add-on repository into something much larger. FESCo is responsible for >all technical decisions in Fedora including those that affect these groups. Not that I'm disagreeing with you, but what technical decisions effect artwork or translations or the management of documentation? I cannot remember ever dealing with anything involving artwork in my entire tenure in FESCo. Documentation is impacted from a content point of view, but they have their own committee and aside from the Feature stuff FESCo doesn't really have any direct impact on them. Similarly for translation. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
