On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 20:45 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > IMO, it made sense only during the time when it was a steering committee > for the Fedora Extras repository. Now FESCo duties are broad and I don't > see why someone only involved with artwork, L10N or documentation but > not packaging shouldn't be a leader. That would make sense if they were making decisions and guidance over those groups, only I don't think they are. FESCo's primarily concerned with the packages and distribution release side of the house. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
