On 05/21/2009 08:58 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2009-05-21 at 20:45 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> IMO, it made sense only during the time when it was a steering committee >> for the Fedora Extras repository. Now FESCo duties are broad and I don't >> see why someone only involved with artwork, L10N or documentation but >> not packaging shouldn't be a leader. > > That would make sense if they were making decisions and guidance over > those groups, only I don't think they are. FESCo has grown from being a group concerned only about packages in a add-on repository into something much larger. FESCo is responsible for all technical decisions in Fedora including those that affect these groups. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
