Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/19/2009 12:24 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le mardi 19 mai 2009 à 20:56 +0200, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
I think
that Fedora should only abide to US laws and the burden to make derivative
works that are consistent with other country law should be on the
shoulder of those who want to have a distro acceptable for their law.

Why do you think the US is any more neutral in this matter than other
countries ?


Because of spot's response on https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/110 ::

jstanley:
1) What is the legal issue (if there is one)?
[...]
spot:
So, to your questions:

1. There is no specific legal issue at this time.

-Toshio

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux