Re: Package Maintainers Flags policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 09:24:37PM +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mardi 19 mai 2009 à 20:56 +0200, Patrice Dumas a écrit :
> > I think 
> > that Fedora should only abide to US laws and the burden to make derivative 
> > works that are consistent with other country law should be on the 
> > shoulder of those who want to have a distro acceptable for their law.
> 
> Why do you think the US is any more neutral in this matter than other
> countries ?

I don't think so, and I said above that there are things I dislike in 
US laws, but Redhat and fedora are US entities, so it somehow
determines the minimal set of laws fedora shouldn't break.

--
Pat

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux