On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 09:59 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > > On Tue, 19 May 2009, alcapcom wrote: > > > 2009/5/18 Björn Persson <bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> To me it would seem more reasonable to install the flags by default. Then the > >> anti-whatever extremists could just remove them, and the more relaxed among > >> us would see the user interface the way the authors intended without jumping > >> through additional hoops. > > > > +1 > > > > But I will try to say it in another way. > > > > Unfortunate peoples that live in countries where a _simple_ flag can > > give troubles for whatever cause/reason, can remove them all to be > > able to use Fedora. But please, don't cut our freedom just to be more > > friendly with authoritarian regimes. > > What if a non-authoritarian regime didn't want us to distribute a flag > that was offensive to their democratically-empowered populace? Would that > be okay then? Say, using pretzels and sausages on flags instead of Swastikas... http://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/0,1518,617987,00.html > the whole reason for nuking the set of flags entirely is so we are NOT > choosing sides. Which was my early answer to Kevin on the subject, and comforts me in my thinking :) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
