On 5/17/2009 12:44 PM, Alexander Boström wrote: > David skrev: > >> User's choice. If it breaks the user gets to keep the pieces. > > Yes. > > And when it does break and when the user writes a thorough useful bug > report(*), then we thank them for it and encourage them to continue > doing so. Especially when it's only a couple of weeks until the next > release. > > /abo > > *) I haven't actually looked at the linked bug reports, so I can't judge > the quality of those. > Okay I'll try again. I am happy that the OP is using Fedora and has for a long time. I am happy that he is testing / trying the Rawhide that will be Fedora 11. I am sorry that he has this problem. Itis good that he reported it and posted it to bugzilla. Okay? But I wish, for his sake, that he was not having this problem on his production machine because *I still think Rawhide on a critical, must have machine is not a good idea.* Users should run Rawhide on non critical machines like the instructions / suggestions plainly say. Or have a duel boot such as I do. Have a great day. -- David -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
