On 05/15/2009 12:53 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 05/15/2009 03:04 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Btw, the F-10 update would have had a higher %release than the F-11
update (1.0.21-4.fc10 > 1.0.21-3.fc11).
Sigh, why do people keep doing this instead of using proper 3.fc10.1
versioning?
Is that method documented anywhere?
Rahul
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches
--
Manuel Wolfshant linux registered user #131416
IT manager NoBug Consulting SRL
A: Yes.
>Q: Are you sure?
>>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
