Re: Breaking deps deliberately

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:34:53PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > Btw, the F-10 update would have had a higher %release than the F-11
> > update (1.0.21-4.fc10 > 1.0.21-3.fc11).
> 
> Sigh, why do people keep doing this instead of using proper 3.fc10.1
> versioning? Deliberate breaking of upgrade paths also needs to be banned!

Yes, that's wrong.  I usually get this right ('X%{?_dist}.Y') but in
this case I must have forgotten.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux