On 05/15/2009 03:30 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 05/15/2009 03:04 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> Michael Schwendt wrote: >>>> Btw, the F-10 update would have had a higher %release than the F-11 >>>> update (1.0.21-4.fc10 > 1.0.21-3.fc11). >>> Sigh, why do people keep doing this instead of using proper 3.fc10.1 >>> versioning? >> Is that method documented anywhere? >> > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches > > ... although I find it a bit weird to have this rule in the Naming Guidelines. I wasn't expecting it to be under naming guidelines either. Would referring to it from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_update_HOWTO help? Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
