On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 04:30 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > I wouldn't consider that a reasonable interpretation. glibc itself > > should be part of core, but we can't consider *every* package part of > > core just because it could provide glibc. > > But any package can install an initscript which runs "reboot", good luck > booting that system without going into interactive boot. well, like I said, we really can't consider egregious abuse in this idea, but that doesn't shoot it down entirely. The idea is not that it's bulletproof, just better. Anyone can cite ways to vandalize just about anything, but that's not an excuse not to try. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
