On Fri, 2009-05-08 at 18:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > (On a tangent - can anyone think of any reason why we shouldn't enforce > a rule that no package could provide the actual name of another package? > I can't envisage any scenario where (ab)using Provides in that manner > would be useful, but I may be missing something). We do pseudo enforce that at review time. However packaging accidents can lead to strange things, often not intended but undiscovered until its too late. This is one of the things I'd like to solve with automated qa. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
