Re: 182 pending F11 stable updates. WTF?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 19:59 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> Afaik, requests to updates-testing were not processed for F11, e.g. for one or 
> two of my new packages I requested updates-testing for F9, F10 and F11 at the 
> same time, got positive feedback / no negative feedback for F9 or F10 and then 
> moved them all to stable at the same time, resp. canceled the testing request 
> for F11 and made it to a stable one. I guess this affects also other packages, 
> that were updated in F9 or F10 and F11, to have a working update path from FX 
> with updates to FX+1 with updates.

Upgrade paths are a concern yes, however our upgrade path stuff is so
busted anyway when doing upgrades to the next release that... well...
*sigh*.  Perhaps this is just a case of too many streams, and trying to
let people do things ahead of time.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux