Am Donnerstag, den 07.05.2009, 11:25 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating: > On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 19:59 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > Afaik, requests to updates-testing were not processed for F11, e.g. for one or > > two of my new packages I requested updates-testing for F9, F10 and F11 at the > > same time, got positive feedback / no negative feedback for F9 or F10 and then > > moved them all to stable at the same time, resp. canceled the testing request > > for F11 and made it to a stable one. I guess this affects also other packages, > > that were updated in F9 or F10 and F11, to have a working update path from FX > > with updates to FX+1 with updates. > > Upgrade paths are a concern yes, however our upgrade path stuff is so > busted anyway when doing upgrades to the next release that... well... > *sigh*. Something is busted anyway is not a convincing argument. Effectively through the upgrade paths the development freeze also affects all releases < F11, so effectively it's impossible to add new packages to the stable releases for 6 weeks. This is annoying. Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
