On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 11:59 -0600, Jerry James wrote: > Speaking only for the 1 package I contributed to that 182, this was a > change in the subpackage structure that was needed in a package that > depends on mine. It was a minor change, but I pushed it to -testing > for F-10 and F-11 anyway. I tested it for a week in F-10 and in > Rawhide with no ill effects, so I pushed it to stable for F-10 and > F-11 so that the other packager can go do what he needs to do to his > package. > > If this was the wrong way to address the problem, please educate me on > the correct way. For F11 it could have been done as a buildroot override so that the other packager could build against your change, and then the two packages could be pushed to testing/stable together as one update request. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
