On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 01:25:29AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 07:13:20PM -0500, Matthew Woehlke wrote: > > Matthew Garrett wrote: > >> How many volume control applications do you want us to ship with? The > >> fact that mistakes have been made in the past is not an argument for > >> further mistakes being made in the future. > > > > To ask the dumb question... right now pavucontrol is the only way > > (AFAIK) right now to change relative volume of individual apps, or > > choose output device per-app. Without pavucontrol, how is this supposed > > to be accomplished? > > Per-stream volume control seems to be present in g-v-c. I'm afraid I've > got no idea about per-stream output control - I only have one output > device available here. > > > (Or are both of these being labeled "exotic" use cases that shan't be > > supported OOTB?) > > I don't know. I'd imagine that the first certainly isn't (given that it > seems to be supported), but you'd need to ask someone else about the > second. It would be a shame if the second was considered exotic, since it's supposed to be a feature of PulseAudio. I used it to create this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_make_a_podcast Of course, if I understand correctly, you're not saying pavucontrol would disappear, just that the design considerations under discussion might call for it to not be installed by default. Right? -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
